Why do you believe reference checks are underrated compared to interview scorecards?
Replied byKenny mendes
Chief People Officer at Superhuman
Niche: AI
Revenue: Not Publicly Disclosed/month
Location: San Francisco, California, United States
Started: 2015
Interviewing is a highly flawed process that produces many false positives and negatives. Interview scorecards often over-rotate on brief interactions. Reference checks are far more valuable because they provide rich signals from individuals who have worked with the candidate for years and can objectively vouch for their capabilities.
0
From the Full Interview
This answer is part of a full interview with Kenny mendes, Chief People Officer at Superhuman.
Share this Answer
Found this insight valuable? Share it with your network to help others learn from Kenny mendes's experience.
Cite This Answer
Use this answer in your research, article, or academic work
Related Answers
Some people who work with these systems believe there is something fundamentally unknowable about this technology. Some even describe it as a different kind of being. Do you believe that?
By Jensen Huang
AI
Approx. 18 Billion USD/mo
Why, if you believe in these companies so strongly, are their leaders publicly raising existential alarms?
By Jensen Huang
AI
Approx. 18 Billion USD/mo
What is the compute challenge of building a proactive ambient agent compared to a code generation or chat product?
By Noah Shinn
AI
Pre-Revenue/mo
You believe conflict aversion is the worst trait a CEO can have. Why?
By Ali Ghodsi
AI
Approx. USD 583 Million/mo
You believe AGI is already here in a practical sense. Can you explain your argument?
By Ali Ghodsi
AI
Approx. USD 583 Million/mo
Why do you believe you are living inside a computer simulation?
By Chungin Roy Lee
AI
$500K–$1M/mo
What are the limitations of large language models compared to world models?
By Dr. Fei-Fei Li
AI
Not Publicly Disclosed/mo