You claim frontier AI companies are effectively seeking nationalization. Can you explain that argument?

Most people are reporting this as a debate between safety and non-safety, or regulation versus no regulation. That is not what is actually happening. The philosophical frame that I believe drives the effective altruism movement inside these companies is that they are uniquely deserving of all the world's intellectual property. That is why they cannot work with the military, and that is why they believe they can absorb the IP of businesses into their models. But that philosophical frame requires unlimited liability protection. And there is only one institution that can provide unlimited liability protection. That is the US government, or a consortium of Western governments. What they are actually arguing for, though they cannot say it plainly because it would collapse their investor base overnight, is nationalization. When the investors realize they are the mark and not the beneficiary, the business collapses. Then the government steps in.